Science and Philosophy

Philosophy and Science

Philosophy has acquired a formal institutional status similar to scientific disciplines — it is studied in universities, published in peer-reviewed journals, and referenced in academic circles.
It has a specific subject matter and employs distinct methods of inquiry. For example, dialectical reasoning is central in Marxist philosophy.
Like other sciences, philosophy has developed its own language, technical terms, and conceptual frameworks. Great emphasis is placed on the meaning, structure, and logical syntax of its concepts.
Philosophy, like science, builds a coherent body of knowledge, often preserved and expanded through written texts and advanced academic study.

However:

Having an institutional structure alone is not enough to classify philosophy as a science.
The subject matter of philosophy is difficult to identify clearly. Unlike physics or chemistry — which deal with specific phenomena — branches like epistemology and ontology deal with abstract concepts, such as knowledge and being, which are hard to confine within empirical limits.
For instance, if ontology studies “everything that exists,” then it overlaps with philosophy itself, raising the question: does a part become equal to the whole?
This ambiguity makes it difficult to scientifically define the boundaries of philosophy.
Additionally, even non-scientific fields like astrology have specialized terminology, which shows that technical language alone does not make a field scientific.
Another concern is that philosophy is difficult to “teach” in the scientific sense. Many philosophical books are more like historical or conceptual expositions, rather than manuals of empirical knowledge or repeatable experiments.

Some scientists believe that science has outgrown the need for philosophy.
Stephen Hawking famously declared the “death of philosophy”, echoing Nietzsche’s phrase “God is dead.”
Commenting on questions about the universe and reality, Hawking stated:
“Traditionally these are questions for philosophy, but philosophy is dead.”
According to this view, scientists now lead in exploring reality, and cosmology, quantum physics, and neuroscience have taken over areas once dominated by philosophers.

Critics argue that philosophy has never provided directly useful contributions to science.
When philosophers seem to contribute, they are often actually engaging in early forms of science.

Example – Plato’s Cosmic Views:

Plato believed that planetary motion should be circular because:
- The mind, when it reflects on itself, moves in a perfect circle.
This philosophical assumption delayed progress in cosmology, as science later showed that orbits are elliptical, not circular.
In modern fields like quantum mechanics, physics is often more effective than philosophy in answering questions such as “What is being measured?”

The fundamental division between philosophy and science lies in their vision of property — how they define and approach knowledge.
The subject matters are different:
- Philosophy explores existence, knowledge, values, and reasoning.
- Physical sciences focus on observable and measurable phenomena.
As Stephen Hawking noted, philosophers are increasingly focusing on human nature, ethics, and society, leaving natural phenomena to scientists.
While science explains, philosophy comprehends — aiming for holistic understanding.

Declaring that “philosophy is useless” is itself a philosophical statement.
To argue against philosophy, one must engage in philosophical reasoning, creating a self-defeating argument.

Scientific revolutions are often driven not just by data, but by paradigm shifts — changes in how scientists perceive and interpret the world.
Thomas Kuhn explained that:
“Scientists working within a given paradigm view the world in different ways.”
These paradigms — often philosophical in nature — shape the way research is conducted, and new theories are discovered.

Philosophy plays an analytical role by examining scientific assumptions and concepts.
Philosophical analysis helps clarify core scientific ideas like:
- Space
- Time
- Energy
- Causality
- Information
This critical reflection helps refine and expand scientific theories.

Philosophy performs several vital functions in the scientific process:

Scrutinizing key terms and assumptions that underlie scientific theories.
Clarifying and analyzing the logic and language used in scientific explanations.
Defining standards for what makes a good theory or a valid model.
Stimulating progress by asking foundational questions.
Providing ethical guidelines and identifying broader goals of scientific inquiry.
Bridging disciplines by showing conceptual interrelations between different domains of knowledge.
Contextualizing scientific observations within a broader worldview.
Building a language that allows scientific insight and human understanding to work together.

Quantum information theory is now a thriving field, contradicting the claim that philosophy has no role.
Einstein’s objections to quantum mechanics were both scientific and philosophical.

1927: Werner Heisenberg declared quantum mechanics to be a complete and closed theory, supported by Bohr, Pauli, and Dirac.
1935: The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) experiment challenged the completeness of quantum mechanics and its compatibility with relativity.
Einstein sought a theory that could define reality independently of the observer, thus pushing both scientific and philosophical boundaries.

Post-EPR, there was philosophical engagement in physics, but this gradually declined.
During the Cold War, the emphasis shifted toward technology and utility, reducing philosophical debate in classrooms.
Equations began to dominate, while discussions about meaning were seen as impractical.

Heisenberg recalled:

“My mind was formed by studying Plato and that sort of things.”

Later generations of physicists embraced a “Shut up and calculate” attitude, focusing on practical application over theory.

With economic downturns, funding cuts, and fewer job opportunities in physics, smaller classes and fewer distractions led scientists to reconsider philosophical foundations.
A new generation began to ask deep questions again, contributing to progress in fields like quantum theory through philosophical inquiry.

Science cannot completely disconnect from philosophy — it needs philosophy to connect isolated knowledge to broader contexts.
While philosophy may appear to be in decline, it remains essential for understanding the universe.
As long as humans question, reflect, and seek meaning, philosophy will continue to shape both scientific thought and human understanding

Also explore